Title |
Impact of resection and systemic therapy on the survival of patients with brain metastasis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, August 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11060-016-2238-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
YueJun Du, Sascha Pahernik, Boris Hadaschik, Dogu Teber, Stephan Duensing, Dirk Jäger, Markus Hohenfellner, Carsten Grüllich |
Abstract |
Patients with brain metastasis (BM) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are associated with poor prognosis. Between 1990 and 2015, data of consecutive RCC patients with BM were retrospectively analyzed from a urologic oncologic database. The treatment outcome was evaluated by overall survival (OS), which was defined as interval from initial diagnosis of BM to death or last follow-up. Statistical analyses of clinical and pathological variables were performed using Cox regression and the Kaplan-Meier method. A total of 116 RCC patients with BM were included. Median time from initial diagnosis of RCC to BM was 15.8 months (95 % CI 11.6-20.0). Median OS after diagnosis of brain metastases of the whole cohort was 5.8 months (95 % CI 4.3-7.2). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, age and histology of non-clear cell RCC were associated with poorer outcome, while targeted therapy (n = 26) (OS 9.9 months, 95 % CI 3.3-16.5) and BM resection (n = 33) (OS 24.7 months, 95 % CI 4-40) were associated with better survival. Furthermore, patients who underwent both targeted therapy and BM resection (n = 5) had the best outcome with median OS of 52.4 months. In conclusion, BM from RCC is associated with a poor oncological outcome. Furthermore, age and histology of non-clear cell RCC are risk factors for poor prognosis. Patients with resectable BM may comprise a better prognostic group. Here, a better OS for resected than unresected patients was observed, which warrants BM resection. A combined modality approach of resection and targeted therapy appears to further improve the outcome of these patients while additional radiation seems to add no benefit. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 23% |
Other | 2 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Professor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 15% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 38% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 15% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 38% |