↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Design and conduct of the activated protein C and corticosteroids for human septic shock (APROCCHSS) trial

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Erratum to: Design and conduct of the activated protein C and corticosteroids for human septic shock (APROCCHSS) trial
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13613-016-0165-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Djillali Annane, Christian Brun-Buisson, Alain Cariou, Claude Martin, Benoit Misset, Alain Renault, Blandine Lehmann, Valérie Millul, Virginie Maxime, Eric Bellissant

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2020.
All research outputs
#14,858,374
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#788
of 1,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,922
of 343,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#21
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.