↓ Skip to main content

Asexuality: Sexual Orientation, Paraphilia, Sexual Dysfunction, or None of the Above?

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
109 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
Title
Asexuality: Sexual Orientation, Paraphilia, Sexual Dysfunction, or None of the Above?
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10508-016-0802-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lori A. Brotto, Morag Yule

Abstract

Although lack of sexual attraction was first quantified by Kinsey, large-scale and systematic research on the prevalence and correlates of asexuality has only emerged over the past decade. Several theories have been posited to account for the nature of asexuality. The goal of this review was to consider the evidence for whether asexuality is best classified as a psychiatric syndrome (or a symptom of one), a sexual dysfunction, or a paraphilia. Based on the available science, we believe there is not sufficient evidence to support the categorization of asexuality as a psychiatric condition (or symptom of one) or as a disorder of sexual desire. There is some evidence that a subset of self-identified asexuals have a paraphilia. We also considered evidence supporting the classification of asexuality as a unique sexual orientation. We conclude that asexuality is a heterogeneous entity that likely meets conditions for a sexual orientation, and that researchers should further explore evidence for such a categorization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 109 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 189 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 18%
Student > Master 30 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 12%
Other 11 6%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 56 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 64 34%
Social Sciences 15 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 6%
Arts and Humanities 11 6%
Philosophy 5 3%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 62 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 166. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2023.
All research outputs
#248,878
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#158
of 3,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,825
of 356,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#6
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.