↓ Skip to main content

Endovascular revascularization of heavily calcified occlusion in superior mesenteric artery using Transcollateral approach

Overview of attention for article published in CVIR Endovascular, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Endovascular revascularization of heavily calcified occlusion in superior mesenteric artery using Transcollateral approach
Published in
CVIR Endovascular, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s42155-021-00232-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazunori Horie, Akiko Tanaka, Norio Tada

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2021.
All research outputs
#11,449,641
of 18,800,073 outputs
Outputs from CVIR Endovascular
#153
of 234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,792
of 339,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CVIR Endovascular
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,800,073 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them