↓ Skip to main content

Screening of phytoconstituents and antibacterial activity of leaves and bark of Quercus leucotrichophora A. Camus from Uttarakhand Himalaya

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Phytoscience, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Screening of phytoconstituents and antibacterial activity of leaves and bark of Quercus leucotrichophora A. Camus from Uttarakhand Himalaya
Published in
Clinical Phytoscience, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40816-018-0090-y
Authors

Prabhakar Semwal, Sakshi Painuli, Himani Badoni, Rakesh K. Bacheti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Researcher 3 7%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 19 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 11%
Chemistry 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 22 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2021.
All research outputs
#14,554,120
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Phytoscience
#27
of 64 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,651
of 439,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Phytoscience
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.