↓ Skip to main content

Stretchable and reflective displays: materials, technologies and strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Nano Convergence, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 113)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Stretchable and reflective displays: materials, technologies and strategies
Published in
Nano Convergence, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40580-019-0190-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Do Yoon Kim, Mi-Ji Kim, Gimin Sung, Jeong-Yun Sun

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Unspecified 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 32 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 18 22%
Materials Science 8 10%
Chemistry 7 9%
Physics and Astronomy 5 6%
Unspecified 5 6%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 33 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#5,064,956
of 24,037,774 outputs
Outputs from Nano Convergence
#25
of 113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,434
of 355,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano Convergence
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,037,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 113 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.