↓ Skip to main content

Intranasal Treatment of Central Nervous System Dysfunction in Humans

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmaceutical Research, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
13 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
246 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
419 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Intranasal Treatment of Central Nervous System Dysfunction in Humans
Published in
Pharmaceutical Research, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11095-012-0915-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colin D. Chapman, William H. Frey, Suzanne Craft, Lusine Danielyan, Manfred Hallschmid, Helgi B. Schiöth, Christian Benedict

Abstract

One of the most challenging problems facing modern medicine is how to deliver a given drug to a specific target at the exclusion of other regions. For example, a variety of compounds have beneficial effects within the central nervous system (CNS), but unwanted side effects in the periphery. For such compounds, traditional oral or intravenous drug delivery fails to provide benefit without cost. However, intranasal delivery is emerging as a noninvasive option for delivering drugs to the CNS with minimal peripheral exposure. Additionally, this method facilitates the delivery of large and/or charged therapeutics, which fail to effectively cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Thus, for a variety of growth factors, hormones, neuropeptides and therapeutics including insulin, oxytocin, orexin, and even stem cells, intranasal delivery is emerging as an efficient method of administration, and represents a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of diseases with CNS involvement, such as obesity, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, depression, anxiety, autism spectrum disorders, seizures, drug addiction, eating disorders, and stroke.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 419 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Cuba 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 410 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 61 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 14%
Student > Master 57 14%
Student > Bachelor 35 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 7%
Other 78 19%
Unknown 102 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 54 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 9%
Psychology 36 9%
Neuroscience 29 7%
Other 74 18%
Unknown 125 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#5,415,901
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#546
of 3,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,571
of 198,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.