↓ Skip to main content

The Predation Game: Does dividing attention affect patterns of human foraging?

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
The Predation Game: Does dividing attention affect patterns of human foraging?
Published in
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, May 2021
DOI 10.1186/s41235-021-00299-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian M. Thornton, Jérôme Tagu, Sunčica Zdravković, Árni Kristjánsson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 13 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 12%
Unspecified 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 16 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2021.
All research outputs
#15,685,238
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#264
of 326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,953
of 439,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#17
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.