↓ Skip to main content

The Bologna Process: inception, ‘take up’ and familiarity

Overview of attention for article published in Higher Education, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
The Bologna Process: inception, ‘take up’ and familiarity
Published in
Higher Education, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10734-012-9590-8
Authors

Guy Neave, Amelia Veiga

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 7%
Hungary 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 34 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 22%
Student > Master 8 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 12%
Unspecified 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Other 11 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 26 63%
Unspecified 4 10%
Environmental Science 3 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Other 4 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2012.
All research outputs
#9,023,501
of 11,281,639 outputs
Outputs from Higher Education
#755
of 821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,054
of 119,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Higher Education
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,281,639 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.