↓ Skip to main content

Performance evaluation of the Q.Clear reconstruction framework versus conventional reconstruction algorithms for quantitative brain PET-MR studies

Overview of attention for article published in EJNMMI Physics, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Performance evaluation of the Q.Clear reconstruction framework versus conventional reconstruction algorithms for quantitative brain PET-MR studies
Published in
EJNMMI Physics, May 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40658-021-00386-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniela Ribeiro, William Hallett, Adriana A. S. Tavares

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Master 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 10 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Physics and Astronomy 2 10%
Engineering 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 10 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2021.
All research outputs
#20,707,815
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Physics
#138
of 187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#365,840
of 439,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Physics
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 187 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.