↓ Skip to main content

Adrenal vein sampling: technique and protocol, a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in CVIR Endovascular, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 234)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Adrenal vein sampling: technique and protocol, a systematic review
Published in
CVIR Endovascular, April 2021
DOI 10.1186/s42155-021-00220-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quencer, Keith B.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Lecturer 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 63%
Physics and Astronomy 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,757,501
of 18,800,073 outputs
Outputs from CVIR Endovascular
#43
of 234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,616
of 334,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CVIR Endovascular
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,800,073 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them