↓ Skip to main content

Chromosomal Location of HWA1 and HWA2, Complementary Hybrid Weakness Genes in Rice

Overview of attention for article published in Rice, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Chromosomal Location of HWA1 and HWA2, Complementary Hybrid Weakness Genes in Rice
Published in
Rice, June 2011
DOI 10.1007/s12284-011-9062-2
Authors

Katsuyuki Ichitani, Satoru Taura, Takahiro Tezuka, Yuuya Okiyama, Tsutomu Kuboyama

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Researcher 3 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 77%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2013.
All research outputs
#7,656,056
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Rice
#94
of 393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,219
of 116,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rice
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 393 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them