Title |
Sustained oxygenation improvement after first prone positioning is associated with liberation from mechanical ventilation and mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients: a cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, April 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13613-021-00853-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gaetano Scaramuzzo, Lorenzo Gamberini, Tommaso Tonetti, Gianluca Zani, Irene Ottaviani, Carlo Alberto Mazzoli, Chiara Capozzi, Emanuela Giampalma, Maria Letizia Bacchi Reggiani, Elisabetta Bertellini, Andrea Castelli, Irene Cavalli, Davide Colombo, Federico Crimaldi, Federica Damiani, Maurizio Fusari, Emiliano Gamberini, Giovanni Gordini, Cristiana Laici, Maria Concetta Lanza, Mirco Leo, Andrea Marudi, Giuseppe Nardi, Raffaella Papa, Antonella Potalivo, Emanuele Russo, Stefania Taddei, Guglielmo Consales, Iacopo Cappellini, Vito Marco Ranieri, Carlo Alberto Volta, Claude Guerin, Savino Spadaro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 6 | 17% |
Italy | 5 | 14% |
Spain | 3 | 9% |
Chile | 2 | 6% |
Nicaragua | 1 | 3% |
Peru | 1 | 3% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Argentina | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 14 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 28 | 80% |
Scientists | 3 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 15% |
Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
Lecturer | 3 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 16% |
Unknown | 38 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 15% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 39 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,162,044
of 24,394,820 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#129
of 1,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,235
of 430,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#10
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,394,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.