| Title |
Circadian rhythms in septic shock patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-021-00833-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gunnar Lachmann, Bharath Ananthasubramaniam, Viktor A. Wünsch, Lara-Marie Scherfig, Clarissa von Haefen, Cornelia Knaak, Andreas Edel, Lukas Ehlen, Barbara Koller, Anton Goldmann, Hanspeter Herzel, Achim Kramer, Claudia Spies |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 3 | 11% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Cabo Verde | 1 | 4% |
| Israel | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 75% |
| Scientists | 5 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 16% |
| Researcher | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,310,680
of 25,332,933 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#300
of 1,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,226
of 434,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#15
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,332,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.