Major Fallacies Surrounding Stone Artifacts and Assemblages

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, August 2016

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

So far, Altmetric has seen 5 X posts from 5 X users, with an upper bound of 29,839 followers.

RT @FilthyMonkeyMen: Nearly 50 years on, things like "what counts as a tool" are still being debated. And that's a good thing. Paper: http…

RT @FilthyMonkeyMen: Nearly 50 years on, things like "what counts as a tool" are still being debated. And that's a good thing. Paper: http…

Nearly 50 years on, things like "what counts as a tool" are still being debated. And that's a good thing. Paper: https://t.co/eJ0MHZDRYi https://t.co/VvrpVE3KRw

Inaugural meeting of the UCT Lithics Masters Club! Discussing "Major fallacies surrounding stone artifacts and assemblages." Dibble et al. 2017 https://t.co/z3Oh5uXvW5 #agree #lithics #journalclub https://t.co/hizrlIwwKM

Major fallacies surrounding stone artifacts and assemblages https://t.co/k6FEsmkvJe https://t.co/4Ern2HwYT0