↓ Skip to main content

Retraction Note: Use of Barbed Sutures in Bariatric Surgery. Review of the Literature

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Retraction Note: Use of Barbed Sutures in Bariatric Surgery. Review of the Literature
Published in
Obesity Surgery, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11695-016-2334-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuel Ferrer-Márquez, Ricardo Belda-Lozano, Alberto Soriano-Maldonado

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#916,192
of 11,341,982 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#75
of 1,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,876
of 264,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#3
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,341,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,954 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.