↓ Skip to main content

Design and validation of tailored colour reference charts for monitoring cultural heritage degradation

Overview of attention for article published in Heritage Science, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Design and validation of tailored colour reference charts for monitoring cultural heritage degradation
Published in
Heritage Science, April 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40494-021-00511-6
Authors

Blanca Ramírez Barat, Emilio Cano, María Teresa Molina, Miguel Antonio Barbero-Álvarez, Juan Antonio Rodrigo, José Manuel Menéndez

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2021.
All research outputs
#5,488,279
of 18,336,925 outputs
Outputs from Heritage Science
#172
of 342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,477
of 327,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heritage Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,336,925 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them