↓ Skip to main content

Emergent salvage surgery for massive hemoptysis after proton beam therapy for lung cancer: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Case Reports, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 504)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Emergent salvage surgery for massive hemoptysis after proton beam therapy for lung cancer: a case report
Published in
Surgical Case Reports, April 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40792-021-01177-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haruaki Hino, Kahori Nakahama, Makoto Ogata, Kayoko Kibata, Chika Miyasaka, Takahiro Utsumi, Natsumi Maru, Hiroshi Matsui, Yohei Taniguchi, Tomohito Saito, Koji Tsuta, Tomohiro Murakawa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2021.
All research outputs
#13,672,601
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Case Reports
#47
of 504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,351
of 434,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Case Reports
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 504 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.