↓ Skip to main content

Economic and fault stability analysis of geothermal field development in direct-use hydrothermal reservoirs

Overview of attention for article published in Geothermal Energy, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Economic and fault stability analysis of geothermal field development in direct-use hydrothermal reservoirs
Published in
Geothermal Energy, April 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40517-021-00193-0
Authors

Caroline Zaal, Alexandros Daniilidis, Femke C. Vossepoel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 25%
Energy 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2021.
All research outputs
#14,775,747
of 19,164,538 outputs
Outputs from Geothermal Energy
#63
of 147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,376
of 327,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geothermal Energy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,164,538 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 147 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them