@shamsJAF23 @gwisk20 IANG but the main issue with it is that it seems to hold string theory to a much higher standard than his own theories that Smolin tries to promote in the book. See here for a response: https://t.co/tl8CFwPQMF (a few years old)
@StuartJRitchie The review of Smolin's book by Sean Carroll (https://t.co/h5DkxfBwgP) is well balanced and is a good entry point for a complex discussion. Mike Duff's article (https://t.co/sZ28Unl3eH) is more partisan, but it clearly shows that string theo
Answering The Critics of M-Theory (String Theory) by M.J. Duff - https://t.co/t1OnTRbT1z #stringtheory #physics #science #ilovescience #STEM
String and M-theory: answering the critics http://t.co/IoJirhfKAF
"the gravitational force is 40 orders of magnitude weaker than the other forces of nature" http://t.co/RWrpDwEISd #physicsisfun #science
String and M-theory: answering the critics http://t.co/NzsIy7kL
arXiv Article - String and M-theory: answering the critics http://t.co/QSPRSk23
String and M-theory: answering the critics http://t.co/9IMZG8FY
Great article by Michael Duff on the string theory / M-theory controversy. But Lee Smolin is not malicious!: http://t.co/O8hOr0c0
【Q】スモリンやWoitだけでなくグラショウや‘tHooftまで弦理論に反対しているが。 【Duff】私は二人を最大級に尊敬しているし、もし彼らが弦理論によらずに重力と量子論を両立させたら躊躇なく弦理論を捨ててそちらを研究をしたい。 http://t.co/JZ2GwnKG
@LostAbaddon Indeed Loop gravity must go faraway. Im reading Duff’s essay http://t.co/hBXdmJ1k In spite of critics String is promising.
[1112.0788] String and M-theory: answering the critics - http://t.co/KgtKbR15
If string theory models are as ugly and misleading as the statements in this paper, it's no wonder they're dying: http://t.co/0uZDbd84
Leitura obrigatória :: Must read :: String and M-theory: answering the critics. (arXiv:1112.0788 [physics.hist-ph]) http://t.co/YmsYOH3M
[1112.0788] String and M-theory: answering the critics - http://t.co/KgtKbR15
Recent exchange on con's (http://t.co/Ra9Me99z ) and pro's (http://t.co/wbznbDsJ ) of the String theory for non-experts.
RT @Exphysicist: 三者鼎談:なぜ統一理論が必要か、そして弦理論とM理論が現在一番有望か。 理論物理のDuffとSmolin、それに科学論のNancy Cartwright http://t.co/tH8pHi7r
三者鼎談:なぜ統一理論が必要か、そして弦理論とM理論が現在一番有望か。 理論物理のDuffとSmolin、それに科学論のNancy Cartwright http://t.co/tH8pHi7r
Will read :). RT @grahamfarmelo: Strong, well-argued riposte to critics of string theory: http://t.co/W00wgvGz
Strong, well-argued riposte to critics of string theory: http://t.co/gqR7tjHm
String and M-theory: answering the critics, M. J. Duff, Nancy Cartwright & Lee Smolin: http://t.co/zuQtKThP
We are all Watford fans here now (see page 7 of http://t.co/0EOYkd7E). Go 'orns! http://t.co/cq05F0cH
String theorist sparks a spat: http://t.co/wm1MeFIf - a full text of Duff's paper can also be found here: http://t.co/T7hcv5RN
Duff = ¿por qué Smolin está equivocado? Porque apoyó a Lisi y Lisi está equivocado. Curioso razonamiento. Pág. 13 de http://t.co/zj4u0qhb
Duff desvaría = Compara la teoría de cuerdas (sin predicciones) con los átomos de Demócrito (400 BC). Pág. 10 de http://t.co/zj4u0qhb
Duff saca las garras= Smolin's "The Trouble with Physics" "is a venomous attack on string theory and its practitioners" http://t.co/zj4u0qhb
Duff being...a duff: http://t.co/vK3rEZVX
Michael Duff on why we need a unified theory: http://t.co/lWji101s
String and M-theory: answering the critics. #arXiv:1112.0788 http://t.co/Hw8xcbwI
String and M-theory: answering the critics http://t.co/a55si75o #physics