↓ Skip to main content

Why are the batteries in the microwave?: Use of semantic information under uncertainty in a search task

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Why are the batteries in the microwave?: Use of semantic information under uncertainty in a search task
Published in
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, April 2021
DOI 10.1186/s41235-021-00294-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gwendolyn L. Rehrig, Michelle Cheng, Brian C. McMahan, Rahul Shome

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 13%
Neuroscience 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2021.
All research outputs
#15,321,186
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#255
of 316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,035
of 432,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#20
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.