↓ Skip to main content

Perioperative hemodynamic optimization: from guidelines to implementation—an experts’ opinion paper

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
61 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Perioperative hemodynamic optimization: from guidelines to implementation—an experts’ opinion paper
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, April 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13613-021-00845-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Luc Fellahi, Emmanuel Futier, Camille Vaisse, Olivier Collange, Olivier Huet, Jerôme Loriau, Etienne Gayat, Benoit Tavernier, Matthieu Biais, Karim Asehnoune, Bernard Cholley, Dan Longrois

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Researcher 3 25%
Other 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2021.
All research outputs
#734,326
of 18,908,606 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#75
of 874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,942
of 328,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,908,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them