| Title |
Perioperative hemodynamic optimization: from guidelines to implementation—an experts’ opinion paper
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-021-00845-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean-Luc Fellahi, Emmanuel Futier, Camille Vaisse, Olivier Collange, Olivier Huet, Jerôme Loriau, Etienne Gayat, Benoit Tavernier, Matthieu Biais, Karim Asehnoune, Bernard Cholley, Dan Longrois |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 11 | 19% |
| Spain | 6 | 10% |
| Colombia | 4 | 7% |
| Paraguay | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 3% |
| Nicaragua | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 91% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 30 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 33 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,180,905
of 24,618,075 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#135
of 1,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,972
of 432,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#9
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,618,075 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.