↓ Skip to main content

Heterologous immunoassay strategy for enhancing detection sensitivity of banned dye rhodamine B in fraudulent food

Overview of attention for article published in Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Heterologous immunoassay strategy for enhancing detection sensitivity of banned dye rhodamine B in fraudulent food
Published in
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, March 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40538-021-00211-0
Authors

Jin Wang, Xing Shen, Peng Zhong, Zhaodong Li, Qiushi Tang, Xinan Huang, Anatoly V. Zherdev, Boris B. Dzantiev, Sergei A. Eremin, Zhili Xiao, Hongtao Lei, Xiangmei Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 33%
Professor 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 17%
Unspecified 1 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2021.
All research outputs
#18,807,229
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
#80
of 127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#317,171
of 420,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.