| Title |
Scratching the surface: the use of sheepskin parchment to deter textual erasure in early modern legal deeds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Heritage Science, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40494-021-00503-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sean Paul Doherty, Stuart Henderson, Sarah Fiddyment, Jonathan Finch, Matthew J. Collins |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 117 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 12% |
| Japan | 11 | 9% |
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 74 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 101 | 86% |
| Scientists | 11 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 25% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1090. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2021.
All research outputs
#14,226
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Heritage Science
#2
of 517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#609
of 456,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heritage Science
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.