@TarbuckSam @MJPadula Sure. But what's the implication from that? Note, I don't follow evidence hierarchies. See: https://t.co/lDQX9RiPA2
RT @angryhacademic: Down with the Hierarchies https://t.co/WeH0jBDjTN A case for getting rid of the (EBM) evidence hierarchy #medtwitter
Down with the Hierarchies https://t.co/WeH0jBDjTN A case for getting rid of the (EBM) evidence hierarchy #medtwitter
@kitchenconserv @kevinnbass Those are views compatible with Epidemiologists. But those hierarchies should be rejected https://t.co/rTwaT5eRcr
@thelowcarb_rd Note, there is no single evidence hierarchy. This is an example of one. https://t.co/rTwaT5eRcr
@p_grayburn @f2harrell @drjohnm @VPrasadMDMPH This isn't really related to my question though. I only commented about flaws because you did! https://t.co/dC7Xg33Wl0
@Scintigraphiste @YrielPenguin Puis sinon je remets ici l'article de Stegenga. Ça date de 2014, il est peut-être virulent et radical mais pas en croisade contre des moulins imaginaires. https://t.co/sjR3uRQ3XA
@Scintigraphiste @Dunwael Pour ceux que ça intéresse et qui n'ont pas peur d'une position radicale (enfin c'est Stegenga quoi) : https://t.co/sjR3uRQ3XA
https://t.co/1UlBsSNWWF Great paper on what I consider an essential topic in research. We need more sophisticated ways of appraising evidence. #research #evidence #evidencebasedmedicine #ebm
RT @EBMplus: Fancy a cheerful Monday morning read? Try Jacob Stegenga's, "Down With The Hierarchies" #ebmreads https://t.co/y7G56BpQlh
Fancy a cheerful Monday morning read? Try Jacob Stegenga's, "Down With The Hierarchies" #ebmreads https://t.co/y7G56BpQlh
@EvidNutrition @tutoresquirofan @SerafinCuidando @EUFIC @evidpediatria @CGDNE @GuiaSalud @CochraneIberoam @JulioBasulto_DN @buhringk Algunos se posicionan en contra de esas jerarquías. https://t.co/5yJGv1rcnc