| Title |
National Preclinical Sepsis Platform: developing a framework for accelerating innovation in Canadian sepsis research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40635-020-00366-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Asher A. Mendelson, Casey Lansdell, Alison E. Fox-Robichaud, Patricia Liaw, Jaskirat Arora, Jean-François Cailhier, Gediminas Cepinskas, Emmanuel Charbonney, Claudia dos Santos, Dhruva Dwivedi, Christopher G. Ellis, Dean Fergusson, Kirsten Fiest, Sean E. Gill, Kathryn Hendrick, Victoria T. Hunniford, Paulina M. Kowalewska, Karla Krewulak, Christian Lehmann, Kimberly Macala, John C. Marshall, Laura Mawdsley, Braedon McDonald, Ellen McDonald, Sarah K. Medeiros, Valdirene S. Muniz, Marcin Osuchowski, Justin Presseau, Neha Sharma, Sahar Sohrabipour, Janet Sunohara-Neilson, Gloria Vázquez-Grande, Ruud A. W. Veldhuizen, Donald Welsh, Brent W. Winston, Ryan Zarychanski, Haibo Zhang, Juan Zhou, Manoj M. Lalu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 12 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 42% |
| Scientists | 10 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 12 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,734,579
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#39
of 444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,333
of 423,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.