| Title |
Self-efficacy and humanitarian aid workers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of International Humanitarian Action, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41018-021-00092-w |
| Authors |
Christine R. Turner, Donald Bosch, Anne A. T. Nolty |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Researcher | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 71% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,990,046
of 23,289,753 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#76
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,685
of 421,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,289,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.