↓ Skip to main content

Sustainable operation of geothermal power plants: why economics matters

Overview of attention for article published in Geothermal Energy, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 145)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Sustainable operation of geothermal power plants: why economics matters
Published in
Geothermal Energy, March 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40517-021-00183-2
Authors

Fynn V. Hackstein, Reinhard Madlener

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Student > Master 3 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 5 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 36%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 7%
Decision Sciences 1 7%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Unknown 6 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2021.
All research outputs
#10,534,758
of 18,890,258 outputs
Outputs from Geothermal Energy
#26
of 145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,936
of 367,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geothermal Energy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,890,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 145 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them