↓ Skip to main content

Introduction to thematic series “new sociological perspectives on inequality”

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Chinese Sociology, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Introduction to thematic series “new sociological perspectives on inequality”
Published in
The Journal of Chinese Sociology, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40711-021-00145-y
Authors

Mike Savage, Chunling Li

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 67%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 67%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2021.
All research outputs
#807,288
of 19,833,325 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Chinese Sociology
#5
of 53 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,418
of 311,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Chinese Sociology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,833,325 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them