| Title |
“Pigtail through snare” technique: an easy and fast way to retrieve a catheter fragment with inaccessible ends
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CVIR Endovascular, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s42155-021-00218-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kensaku Mori, Chika Somagawa, Shun Kagaya, Masafumi Sakai, Satoshi Homma, Takahito Nakajima |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 139 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 44 | 32% |
| Spain | 14 | 10% |
| India | 7 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 4% |
| Germany | 5 | 4% |
| Colombia | 4 | 3% |
| Mexico | 4 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 35 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 86 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 37 | 27% |
| Scientists | 13 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 63% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2022.
All research outputs
#429,979
of 25,246,334 outputs
Outputs from CVIR Endovascular
#1
of 396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,428
of 428,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CVIR Endovascular
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,246,334 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 396 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.