↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of NaCl and MgCl2 heat exchange fluids in a deep binary geothermal system in a sedimentary halite formation

Overview of attention for article published in Geothermal Energy, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of NaCl and MgCl2 heat exchange fluids in a deep binary geothermal system in a sedimentary halite formation
Published in
Geothermal Energy, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40517-021-00190-3
Authors

Kayla R. Moore, Hartmut M. Holländer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#14,457,068
of 18,758,139 outputs
Outputs from Geothermal Energy
#62
of 144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,361
of 308,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geothermal Energy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,758,139 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them