↓ Skip to main content

High flow nasal oxygen therapy to avoid invasive mechanical ventilation in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: a retrospective study

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
31 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
High flow nasal oxygen therapy to avoid invasive mechanical ventilation in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: a retrospective study
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13613-021-00825-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas Bonnet, Olivier Martin, Marouane Boubaya, Vincent Levy, Nathan Ebstein, Philippe Karoubi, Yacine Tandjaoui-Lambiotte, Guillaume Van Der Meersch, Johanna Oziel, Marie Soulie, Mohamed Ghalayini, Anais Winchenne, Jean Ralph Zahar, Passem Ahmed, Stéphane Gaudry, Yves Cohen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 17%
Student > Postgraduate 13 13%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Master 6 6%
Other 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 32 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 33 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,180,531
of 21,712,946 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#129
of 991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,117
of 315,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,712,946 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them