@Damo__73_ @ellymelly ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh peer reviewed huh? The "scientific method" is now so fucked up that peer review is utterly meaningless: https://t.co/QnpIQViK06 https://t.co/zzDY6f8pbh https://t.co/X9c5NqUPEi https://t.co/grkfA474sN https://t
"We focus on six such cases, providing a rationale why such studies undermine trust and integrity and why such bogus publications are best left to blogs or non-academic forms of publishing science-related topics."
@Curiolog @PresqueRire oui hélas, tout le monde n'a pas saisi le caractère ironique de l'article. La Q fait débat https://t.co/jllGu2Gwfq
Stings, Hoaxes and Irony Breach the Trust Inherent in Scientific Publishing | SpringerLink https://t.co/LuQW5wOJGd