| Title |
Intensive care management of patients with COVID-19: a practical approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-021-00820-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar, Isabela Bispo Santos da Silva Costa, Stephanie Itala Rizk, Bruno Biselli, Brenno Rizerio Gomes, Cristina Salvadori Bittar, Gisele Queiroz de Oliveira, Juliano Pinheiro de Almeida, Mariana Vieira de Oliveira Bello, Cibele Garzillo, Alcino Costa Leme, Moizo Elena, Fernando Val, Marcela de Almeida Lopes, Marcus Vinícius Guimarães Lacerda, José Antonio Franchini Ramires, Roberto Kalil Filho, Jean-Louis Teboul, Giovanni Landoni |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 125 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 19 | 15% |
| Spain | 12 | 10% |
| Argentina | 6 | 5% |
| France | 6 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 5 | 4% |
| Colombia | 4 | 3% |
| Italy | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Paraguay | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 50 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 100 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 13% |
| Scientists | 7 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 416 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 416 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 62 | 15% |
| Researcher | 32 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 30 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 69 | 17% |
| Unknown | 169 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 142 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 43 | 10% |
| Unknown | 169 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2022.
All research outputs
#462,980
of 24,089,711 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#45
of 1,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,938
of 423,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#4
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,089,711 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.