↓ Skip to main content

Monitoring of a reverse cement job in a high-temperature geothermal environment

Overview of attention for article published in Geothermal Energy, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 145)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Monitoring of a reverse cement job in a high-temperature geothermal environment
Published in
Geothermal Energy, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40517-021-00187-y
Authors

Martin P. Lipus, Thomas Reinsch, Tobias B. Weisenberger, Steinar Kragset, Ari Stefánsson, Sigurdur G. Bogason

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 2 50%
Environmental Science 1 25%
Engineering 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2021.
All research outputs
#11,471,614
of 18,838,632 outputs
Outputs from Geothermal Energy
#47
of 145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,154
of 306,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geothermal Energy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,838,632 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 145 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them