↓ Skip to main content

Accuracy of the clinical pulmonary infection score to differentiate ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis from ventilator-associated pneumonia

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Accuracy of the clinical pulmonary infection score to differentiate ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis from ventilator-associated pneumonia
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, August 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13613-020-00721-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandre Gaudet, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Pedro Povoa, Alejandro Rodriguez, Jorge Salluh, Alain Duhamel, Saad Nseir

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Master 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 27 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 27 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2023.
All research outputs
#20,246,480
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#1,035
of 1,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312,572
of 427,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#32
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.