↓ Skip to main content

SentiHealth: creating health-related sentiment lexicon using hybrid approach

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
SentiHealth: creating health-related sentiment lexicon using hybrid approach
Published in
SpringerPlus, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-2809-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammad Zubair Asghar, Shakeel Ahmad, Maria Qasim, Syeda Rabail Zahra, Fazal Masud Kundi

Abstract

The exponential increase in the health-related online reviews has played a pivotal role in the development of sentiment analysis systems for extracting and analyzing user-generated health reviews about a drug or medication. The existing general purpose opinion lexicons, such as SentiWordNet has a limited coverage of health-related terms, creating problems for the development of health-based sentiment analysis applications. In this work, we present a hybrid approach to create health-related domain specific lexicon for the efficient classification and scoring of health-related users' sentiments. The proposed approach is based on the bootstrapping modal, a dataset of health reviews, and corpus-based sentiment detection and scoring. In each of the iteration, vocabulary of the lexicon is updated automatically from an initial seed cache, irrelevant words are filtered, words are declared as medical or non-medical entries, and finally sentiment class and score is assigned to each of the word. The results obtained demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed technique.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 24%
Student > Master 13 14%
Lecturer 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 22 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 37 41%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Decision Sciences 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 32 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2017.
All research outputs
#4,413,765
of 23,979,951 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#260
of 1,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,025
of 369,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#42
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,979,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.