↓ Skip to main content

Modelling an unconventional closed-loop deep borehole heat exchanger (DBHE): sensitivity analysis on the Newberry volcanic setting

Overview of attention for article published in Geothermal Energy, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Modelling an unconventional closed-loop deep borehole heat exchanger (DBHE): sensitivity analysis on the Newberry volcanic setting
Published in
Geothermal Energy, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40517-021-00185-0
Authors

Hannah R. Doran, Theo Renaud, Gioia Falcone, Lehua Pan, Patrick G. Verdin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Master 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 45%
Energy 2 18%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2021.
All research outputs
#14,387,824
of 18,666,194 outputs
Outputs from Geothermal Energy
#62
of 144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289,456
of 416,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geothermal Energy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,666,194 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them