↓ Skip to main content

A review of the design methods of complex topology structures for 3D printing

Overview of attention for article published in Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
Title
A review of the design methods of complex topology structures for 3D printing
Published in
Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s42492-018-0004-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiawei Feng, Jianzhong Fu, Zhiwei Lin, Ce Shang, Bin Li

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 224 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 25%
Student > Master 30 13%
Researcher 25 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 57 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 100 45%
Materials Science 13 6%
Design 8 4%
Chemical Engineering 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 66 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2020.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art
#12
of 48 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,486
of 345,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one scored the same or higher as 36 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them